Your comparison of such, like items or gameparse per say is like saying a movie critic is breaking the law for giving a review of a move to those who havent seen the movie. To compare the said products as I said, is ludicrous. ↑ “ That is because I ll be the first to ridicule stupidity. Yes like magelo, yes like eqplaynice, yes like wineq2 and yes like ISB etc. In my case sure I could have used a directx screen scraper and inserted the timestamp that way on top of the UI (overlay) but really it seems like such overkill for such a benign feature add, and being the reasonable person that I am I took a page from others that have perfectly legal feature adding methods in their program already and just load my addons using LoadLibrary. So again, if we get hung up on methods where log file reading and staying outside of the process memory is the gold standard we are heading into questionable territory there as well) (I remember some guy that just read from the log file and used like autoit to answer tells, and that was not considered ok. The only thing that matters is what you do with the extracted information. Both can be good and both can be bad.īottom line is, don't be distracted by which method a program uses, be it, log file reading/injected reading or network reading. ![]() It's not automatically a indication of a approved program no matter which method of data collection you use to get to it, be it at the network layer or be it by reading the packets from inside the client. I know the ShowEQ reference was just an example of the fact that just because you stay at the network layer, you can still do bad things. ![]() Mrmajestykx: I admit I haven't looked into the magelo collector or the one eqresource use but I'm 99% sure without looking closer that both injects to extract their data.Īllakhazam extracts it from the network packets directly (props guys, that's not as easy)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |